Home » Posts tagged 'seven churches'

Tag Archives: seven churches

Breastfed by the Whore of Rome

Famous Statute of She-wolf with Romulus and Remus

The most famous example of this iconic figure, located in Rome.

Those familiar with Roman history, culture, and imperialistic propaganda recognize this iconic tableau.  Three simple objects: the Roman she-wolf (Lupa Romana), Romulus, and Remus.  This simple scene was part of the founding myth of the city of Rome, purportedly in the 8th century BC, and its ensuing empire that dominated the world in which the prophet John wrote and ministered.  Founding myths from antiquity often contained irreconcilable legends and characters, and that is clearly true of the founding myths of Rome.  This problem was also recognized by the ancients themselves who then usually combined (unsuccessfully) elements of the various legends into one founding myth.

Our concern is the myth, preserved in a variety of Greek and Latin sources, that identified two suckling babies, Romulus and Remus, as the founders of Rome.  Once upon a time there was an internecine struggle within a royal family in Italy.  There were infant heirs abandoned at the Tiber River, only to be (miraculously) rescued from sure doom and then they were suckled by a she-wolf.  Stated briefly they are reared and develop into adult proto-types of later Roman leaders.  There is a sibling quarrel in which Remus is killed by his brother Romulus in conjunction with the founding of a new city.  As sole survivor Romulus establishes the new city, names it Rome after himself, and rules the Roman people.  Thus, Romulus is considered by everyone to be the Founder of Rome and all that it will ever become.

This iconic picture came to stand for the very heart of Roman history, religion, and culture, especially with the promotion of the divinity of Romulus later in life.  Following is a summary of the apotheosis (deification, consecratio) of Romulus given in the works of two Augustan era writers, the historian Livy and the poet Ovid.  Based upon Livy, Romulus is taken into heaven during a meeting with Roman Senators, “snatched away to heaven by a whirlwind” and declared by those nearby as “a god, the son of a god, the King and Father of the City of Rome.”  Accordingly, Romulus was prayed to and petitioned for grace, favor, protection, and good fortune for the Roman people.  Sometime later the god Romulus appeared again on earth to give this divine commission, predicting Rome’s future global domination,

“Go,” said he, “tell the Romans that it is the will of heaven that my Rome should be the head of all the world.  Let them henceforth cultivate the arts of war, and let them know assuredly, and hand down the knowledge to posterity, that no human might can withstand the arms of Rome” (Livy, History of Rome, I.16).

In poetic parlance Ovid depicted the god Mars speaking to Jupiter (Zeus) with these words about the ascent of Romulus into the heavens,

Since the Roman state is strong, on firm foundations, and does not depend on a single champion: free his spirit, and raising him from earth set him in the heavens. You [Jupiter] once said to me [Mars], in person, at a council of the gods (since I am mindful of the gracious words I noted in my retentive mind), “There will be one whom you will raise to azure heaven” (Metamorphoses, Book 14.805-828, Translated by A. S. Kline © 2000 All Rights Reserved).

The god Mars then comes to Rome and brings Romulus to heaven to be there with the Olympian deities.

Roman denarius, 137 BC, used by permission of cngcoins.com

Roman denarius, issued in 137 BC, used by permission of cngcoins.com.

It is not a wild theory to imagine that those early believers living in Roman Asia knew this founding myth and its iconography, since it had been on Roman coins since the time of the Republic and was well known in popular art and literature.  Obviously the prophet John did not believe in the divinity of Romulus, nor the Roman propagandistic ideology that “it is the will of heaven that my Rome should be the head of all the world” (Livy, History of Rome, I.16).  John knew instead that the future destiny of the world and its inhabitants was not controlled by Roman hegemony, but by “the kingdom of our Lord and of his Messiah” (Rev. 11:15).  Indeed, as Revelation chapter 17:5 makes clear, John viewed Rome, with all her wealth and worldly influence, as the mother of all whores, a decadent slut.

Roman Aureus minted under Vespasian AD 77-78, used by permission of cngcoins.com

Roman Aureus minted under Vespasian AD 77-78, used by permission of cngcoins.com

Had all the believers in these seven congregations of Roman Asia agreed with John’s penetrating ridicule of Rome, then John would not have written Revelation the same way.  But in fact not all believers in churches, both then and now, embrace the Bible’s intolerant outlook toward whoring cultures and civilizations.  For some in John’s congregations it was just too easy and comforting to go to the breasts of Rome, to the she-wolf.  The milk of conformity, the zeitgeist of John’s culture and ours, seems too sweet and soothing, indeed tranquilizing.  Imagine the iconic tableau we began with, but now those two infants are no longer Romulus and Remus, but the Nicolaitans (Rev. 2:6) and Balaamites (Rev. 2:14), assimilated first century churchgoers whose works and influence must be hated (Rev. 2:6). 

Much like Romulus and Remus there were Christians in the seven congregations who had experienced the she-wolf’s milk as sustaining and fulfilling, indeed as life and sustenance.  John’s call to his readers is to walk away from the she-wolf and to refuse being suckled on Rome’s milk of wealth, decadence, abusive power, and idolatry, and rather to walk toward the Lamb and follow the Lamb wherever he leads (Rev. 14:4).

Looking for a Blessing [Part 1]

When John presents material in groups of seven, he sometimes uses the word “seven;” there are, for example, “seven stars,” “seven lamp stands,” “seven churches,” and “seven seals.”  At other times John’s prophetic book has implicit sevens, such the heavenly encomium that  lists  (1) power, (2) riches, (3) wisdom, (4) strength, (5) honor, (6) glory, and (7) blessing (Rev. 5:12).  Whether implicit or explicit these groupings of seven are called heptads.  
One of John’s implicit heptads begins in chapter one (Rev. 1:3) and comes to its conclusion in the final chapter of Revelation (22:7).  This particular heptad is identified generally by John’s use of the phrase “Blessed (Greek, makarios) is the one . . . .” or “Blessed (Greek, makarioi) are those . . . .”  When we look at these seven teachings about blessings (Rev. 1:3; 14:13; 16:15; 19:9; 20:6; 22:7, 14), it is more than just a little interesting that two (Rev. 1:3; 22:7) of the seven blessings of this particular heptad are related to the hearer “keeping” the words of John’s prophetic book.  How does one do that?
More than one interpreter of Revelation has questioned whether it is possible to “keep the words” of a book of visions.  The theologically young Martin Luther raised such a question.  His comment on this issue can be found within his generally disparaging views about the entire book of Revelation that were written in his 1522 introduction to the New Testament.  Luther wrote (in Luther’s later edition of the New Testament his ideas on the book of Revelation were more pious and orthodox sounding),
I say what I feel.  I miss more than one thing in this book, and it makes me consider it to be neither apostolic nor prophetic.  First and foremost, the apostles do not deal with visions, but prophesy in clear and plain words. . . .  For it befits the apostolic office to speak clearly of Christ and his deeds, without images and visions. . . .  Again, they are suppose to be blessed who keep what is written in this book; and yet no one knows what that is, to say nothing of keeping it.  
Notwithstanding Luther’s criticisms, it is clear that John was doing what he was told to do, since Christ commanded him “Write on a scroll what you see” (Rev. 1:11a).  Perhaps Luther had a memory lapse [or worse, was only a left brain theologian], for there were certainly many examples in the Hebrew Scriptures of God’s prophets “seeing” a message from God, rather than merely “hearing” a message from God.  In Hebrew prophecy it is not just a matter of a “word from the Lord,” but also a “vision from the Lord.”  As we will see, Revelation is not the only book of Scripture that requires an appreciation for the visual, the imaginative, and the poetic in order to interpret it carefully.
Isaiah the prophet, for example, reveals that, “The vision concerning Judah and Jerusalem that Isaiah son of Amoz saw during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings of Judah” (Isa. 1:1) and “The word that Isaiah son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem” (Isa. 2:1) and “The oracle concerning Babylon which Isaiah the son of Amoz saw” (Isa. 13:1).
Amos the prophet similarly wrote, “The words of Amos, one of the shepherds of Tekoa—what he saw concerning Israel two years before the earthquake, when Uzziah was king of Judah and Jeroboam son of Jehoash was king of Israel” (Amos 1:1).
Micah the prophet reports, “The word of the LORD that came to Micah of Moresheth during the reigns of Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings of Judah—the vision he saw concerning Samaria and Jerusalem” (Micah 1:1). 
Ezekiel the prophet confirms a related experience when writing, “the heavens were opened and I saw visions of God” (Ezek. 1:1) and “I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire” (Ezek. 8:2).
  
Obadiah the prophet begins, “The vision of Obadiah. Thus says the Lord GOD concerning Edom — We have heard a report from the LORD” (Obad. 1:1a).
  
Nahum the prophet indicates a similar experience when he reports, “An oracle concerning Nineveh. The book of the vision of Nahum the Elkoshite. The LORD is a jealous and avenging God; the LORD takes vengeance and is filled with wrath” (Nah. 1:1).
TO BE CONTINUED IN THE NEXT POST

WHEN IS LOVE NOT ENOUGH?

Who knows why some believers in Thyatira thought that being loving toward others is enough to please God;  perhaps they had only heard of the 2nd Great Commandment and not realized that there is a prior one that requires even more, namely a deeply rooted devotion to God (Matt. 22:34-39).  In any case, some of the believers in this congregation addressed by the prophet John clearly assumed that all would be well with them spiritually as long as they possessed love and faith and practiced good deeds.  The lopsided theology of the congregation at Thyatira was characterized by their obedience to the 2nd Commandment but their egregious disobedience to the 1st Commandment.  As Jesus of Nazareth made plain, loving one’s neighbor is not at the top of God’s list.  And Jesus, like every other Jew, clearly knew that one could not keep the 1st Commandment by merely fulfilling the 2nd Commandment.  A group of Christians at Thyatira, like some of their North America Christian descendants, seem to have forgotten that the deep and total devotion to God depicted by Moses in Deut. 6:5, the famous Shema, stands as Jesus’ 1st and Greatest Commandment. 
In light of all the struggles these 7 congregations of Roman Asia were undergoing in relationship to their surrounding culture, why in the world would Christ complain about and threaten a congregation that had such commendable love and faith and service in its resume?  After all, Jesus’ own evaluation of Thyatira was, “I know your deeds, your love and faith, your service and perseverance, and that you are now doing more than you did at first” (Rev. 2:19).  Jesus’ later anger at this congregation in Thyatira was the result of a gifted woman’s formidable influence in the congregation.  Based upon the fragmentary evidence available from the letter itself (Rev. 2:18-29), this unnamed woman assumed a prophetic ministry and allowed herself and her followers to stray from 1st Commandment devotion and loyalty to God.  This influential woman, whom John compares to Jezebel, was guilty of syncretism that compromised 1st Commandment loyalty by leading God’s people into idolatry and spiritual unfaithfulness.  In order to fit into the culture more easily she and her followers were willing to participate in the world of idolatry rather than give themselves totally to the one true God.  
Although this woman Jezebel and her followers are part of a congregation with an otherwise fantastic resume, this congregation allows her to promote what Christ labels as “Satan’s deep secrets” (Rev. 2:24).  This Satanic heresy in the congregation had apparently not even had a negative impact on its “success”  since the congregation at Thyatira was continuing in its growth.  This group of Christians, according to Jesus, was “now doing more than they had done at first”  (Rev. 2:19b).  Since the circumstances of this congregation seems to have been known to “all the congregations” of Roman Asia (Rev. 2:23), it would be no surprise to learn that this congregation’s ministry team might have been the envy of all Asia Minor.  
While this church’s successes in the areas of love, faith, and service were enough to satisfy itself, it was about to encounter the “fiery-eyed” Messiah (Rev. 2:18) and his message to this church that I am “against you” (Rev. 2:20).  Regardless of this church’s future behavior and response to Christ, they would certainly leave this encounter learning afresh from the Messiah the importance of the 1st Great Commandment.
To be sure, many American congregations have also been seduced by American Civil Religion to believe that love, faith, and good deeds are paramount to the life of a Christian, even though in reality by themselves these virtues are not enough for the followers of God and Jesus Christ.  This crippling distortion of acceptable congregational life seems to thrive in North American churches.  After all, what contemporary minister would not love to lead a congregation that possessed “love, faith, service, and perseverance” (Rev. 2:19a).  The troubling question is whether many of these ministers would be willing to subvert the status quo of American Christianity by elevating “you shall have no other gods before Me” (Deut. 5:7) on the list of frequent sermon topics?
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 66 other followers

%d bloggers like this: